CYBER CRIME – THE INTERNET IS THE NEW FRONTIER FOR CRIMINAL OFFENCE
![]() | |
CYBER SECURITY |
INTRODUCTION
Crime is not a recent phenomenon; in fact, it is as ancient as humanity itself. Crime arises from a combination of social and economic factors. Crime can take many forms, but what remains consistent is that its effects are harmful and adverse.
In developing countries, cybercrime is increasing rapidly, driven largely by the massive penetration of technology in daily life. Today, even basic services such as billing systems, cab bookings, and online ordering of food and textiles have gone digital. Technology’s pervasive role in our lives is so profound that it is difficult to imagine a day without using laptops or mobile phones.
The term “cybercrime” is not explicitly defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000, nor in the Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008, or any other Indian legislation. In my opinion, it cannot be fully captured by a single definition because it encompasses both “crime” and “computers.”
Various laws in India, including the Indian Penal Code, 1860, address specific offences, many of which can fall under the broader ambit of cybercrime. Essentially, any offence committed by means of a computer or digital device qualifies as cybercrime. In some cases, computers or data themselves are the targets of crimes; at other times, they serve as tools used to facilitate offences by providing necessary inputs.
The Information Technology Act, 2000 (Act No. 21 of 2000), received Presidential assent on June 9, 2000, and came into effect on October 17, 2000. This landmark legislation addresses the following key areas:
Legal recognition of electronic documents
Legal recognition of digital signatures
Offences and contraventions related to cyber activities
Establishment of a justice dispensation system for cybercrime
As the first legislation addressing cyber offences, the IT Act, 2000, attracted debates, reviews, and criticisms. Some considered it draconian; others found it too lenient. Several omissions caused delays in investigations, with more reliance still placed on the IPC rather than the IT Act.
Recognizing the need for a more detailed and robust framework, the Information Technology Amendment Act, 2008 (ITAA 2008) was passed by Parliament and received Presidential assent on February 5, 2009. It came into effect on October 27, 2009.
Essential Features of the IT Amendment Act, 2008:
Focus on data privacy
Emphasis on information security
Definition of cyber cafés
Technology-neutral approach to digital signatures
Specification of reasonable security practices for corporations
Redefinition of the role of intermediaries
Inclusion of additional cybercrimes such as child pornography and cyber terrorism
Authorization of Inspectors to investigate cyber offences
In today’s world, it is impossible to imagine life without technology. However, security measures often lag behind technological advances. The internet has become a new, profitable frontier for criminal activity. Fortunately, evolving laws seek to protect users against these threats by broadening the list of cyber offences.
Penalty and Compensation for Damage to Computer Systems — Section 43
Unauthorized access, downloading, introduction of viruses, disruption, denial of access, data manipulation, and other damaging acts relating to computers, systems, or networks are punishable. Civil liability includes compensation of up to ₹1 crore.
Compensation for Failure to Protect Data — Section 43A
Where a corporate entity is negligent in securing sensitive personal data causing wrongful loss or gain, it is liable to pay compensation up to ₹5 crore.
Cyber Offences and Punishments
Tampering with Computer Source Documents (Section 65): Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹2 lakh, or both.
Computer Related Offences (Section 66): Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹5 lakh, or both.
Sending Offensive Messages (Section 66A): Imprisonment up to 3 years and fine.
Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Computer Resource (Section 66B): Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹1 lakh, or both.
Identity Theft (Section 66C): Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹1 lakh, or both.
Cheating by Personation (Section 66D): Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹1 lakh, or both.
Violation of Privacy (Section 66E): Imprisonment up to 3 years, fine up to ₹2 lakh, or both.
Cyber Terrorism (Section 66F): Imprisonment up to life.
Publishing Obscene Material (Section 67): Imprisonment 3 years (first offence), 5 years (subsequent), and fines up to ₹10 lakh.
Publishing Sexually Explicit Material (Section 67A): Imprisonment 5 years (first offence), 7 years (subsequent), and fines up to ₹10 lakh.
Publication for Fraudulent Purposes (Section 74): Imprisonment up to 2 years or fine up to ₹1 lakh, or both.
While a crime-free society remains a utopian ideal, laws continually strive to minimize crime levels. In a society where technology use is ubiquitous, electronic crimes are bound to increase. Lawmakers must continually adapt to maintain peace and security.
Technology is a double-edged sword: it can be used for both good and ill. It is the responsibility of users and legislators alike to ensure technology is used ethically and not as a tool for committing crimes.
https://shataxiamicuslex.blogspot.com/2019/08/how-new-cyber-laws-can-protect-you-from.html
Haha. The funny part of your IT act 2000 is if we stuck by the rules then everything is a criminal and everyone is the victim and if we start following the every rules then we won't be able to do our daily things. Your Government seems to be bit confused in making rules when it comes to the term "Cyber Security". I think Laws can't do anything unless we overcome Human Stupidity and Social Engineering. Your Laws can't help anyone until they don't want to be secure or I can say unless the world want to be secure because you never know what is at the dark side of your so called secure WORLD. Laws are just made to cover the mistakes.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI think if IT act was working as it meant to be then more than half Indians were in Jail now. And working of laws in India is so good that it won't effect any of us. And knowledge of making laws is not important for civilians LAWS are important for them. And there are bunch of peoples inside and outside in India who are manipulating your rules and your government is just seeing them doing so.
DeleteAnd do you really think you can stop Hackers by changing the settings of your IOT devices. If have any special method please share with us so we could also be safe. (Please don't share the shitty things like disallowing the application access prompts and turning off your local services)
ReplyDeleteI think she is not a Hacker.. she is a lawyer and she is doing great in it.. job of lawyer is to defend the victims not to make laws and rules.. she is just sharing the knowledge which is useful for us in improving our services.. maybe there are some dumbs at the higher post but it not mean that Hackers can safely commit crimes.. Hacking is all about Ethics..if you've ethics then you need no rules to defend yourself but if you go against ethics there are no rules to defend you.. laws are not made for breaking them they are made to protect the innocents one from the dark side..
DeleteIPC do not mention such high punishments as IT act do.... Great to know
ReplyDelete